Health goals and targets have been widely used to indicate strategic direct
ion and priority for health improvement on a population basis. This paper p
rovides an overview of Australia's experience in using health targets and c
onsiders the relevance of this experience for Canada. It gives special atte
ntion to the challenge of developing a broadly based set of targets that re
flect the social, economic and environmental determinants of health alongsi
de more traditional measures of health status. It examines how the technica
l challenge of measurement, the bureaucratic barriers between government de
partments, and the political conservatism inherent in federal systems of go
vernment present formidable barriers to effective action on comprehensive n
ational health targets.
The paper concludes with a reminder of the need for intersectoral action to
address the determinants of health. Based on the Australian experience, it
suggests for Canada an ideal combination of a national population health f
ramework to guide direction and priority, to be implemented through action
at a more local level, through well-defined partnership.