An improved method of analysis is presented for the interpretation of fouli
ng in shell and tube heat exchangers. The method reveals weaknesses that ar
e inherent in commonly used but simpler approaches to the interpretation of
plant data. It is shown, for example, that by neglecting the effect of by-
passing and the effect of heat transfer coefficient variation through an ex
changer, it is possible to become misled into believing that a heat exchang
er may be fouled when actually it is clean. The improved method of analysis
shows that the corresponding 'apparent fouling resistance' of a clean heat
exchanger is higher the lower its temperature effectiveness. The improved
method is applied firstly to a hypothetical heat exchanger located in a tra
in of clean exchangers and secondly to the shell and tube exchangers in an
oil refinery crude preheat train.