Transdermal delivery allows continuous systemic application of opioids thro
ugh the intact skin. This review analyses the pharmacokinetic properties of
transdermal opioid administration in the context of clinical experience, w
ith a focus on fentanyl.
A transdermal therapeutic system (TTS) for fentanyl has been developed. The
amount of fentanyl released is proportional to the surface area of the TTS
, which is available in different sizes. After the first application of a T
TS, a fentanyl depot concentrates in the upper skin layers and it takes sev
eral hours until clinical effects are observed. The time from application t
o minimal effective and maximum serum concentrations is 1.2 to 40 hours and
12 to 48 hours, respectively. Steady state is reached on the third day, an
d can be maintained as long as patches are renewed. Within each 72-hour per
iod, serum concentrations decrease gradually over the second and third days
. When a TTS is removed, fentanyl continues to be absorbed into the systemi
c circulation from the cutaneous depot. The terminal half-life for TTS fent
anyl is approximately 13 to 25 hours. The interindividual variability of se
rum concentrations, partly caused by different clearance rates, is markedly
larger than the intraindividual variability.
The effectiveness of TTS fentanyl was first demonstrated in acute postopera
tive pain. However, the slow pharmacokinetics and large variability of TTS
fentanyl, together with the relatively short duration of postoperative pain
, precluded adequate dose finding and led to inadequate pain relief or, esp
ecially, a high incidence of respiratory depression: such use is now contra
indicated. Conversely, in cancer pain, TTS fentanyl offers an interesting a
lternative to oral morphine, and its effectiveness and tolerability in this
indication has been demonstrated by a number of trials. Its usefulness in
chronic pain of nonmalignant origin remains to be confirmed in controlled t
rials.
In general, TTS fentanyl produces the same adverse effects as other opioids
, mainly sedation, nausea, vomiting and constipation. In comparison with or
al morphine, TTS fentanyl causes fewer gastrointestinal adverse events. The
risk of hypoventilation is comparatively low in cancer patients.
Sufentanil and buprenorphine may also be suitable for transdermal delivery,
but clinical results are not yet available. Transdermal morphine is only u
seful if applied to de-epithelialised skin. However, iontophoresis may allo
w transdermal administration of opioids, including morphine, with a rapid a
chievement of steady state concentrations and the ability to adjust deliver
y rates. This would be beneficial for acute and/or breakthrough pain, and i
nitial clinical trials are in progress.