Purpose. To evaluate and compare the efficacy of the four adjunctive agents
to facilitate recipient bed intralamellar dissection in cases of lamellar
keratoplasty. Methods, Forty eyes with partial-thickness corneal opacities
were recruited for this prospective, randomized clinical trial. The cases w
ere divided into four groups per the intralamellar injection (i.e., air [gr
oup I], 2% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose [HPMC] [group II], balanced saline
solution [BSS] [group III], and no adjunct [group IV] used to facilitate r
ecipient intralamellar dissection). The intraoperative parameters evaluated
were initial preparation time, dissection time, and total time. Ar each fo
llow-up, visual acuity, refractive status, keratometry, and endothelial cel
l counts were also analyzed. Results, Initial preparation time, dissection
time, and total time were significantly decreased with the use of an adjunc
t (p < 0.05) and were found to be least with the use of BSS. No difference
in these time frames was noted between group I and group II. Corneal haze a
nd incomplete air insufflation were seen in group I, and difficulty in inje
ction of 2% HPMC and its incomplete spread were noted in group II. The mean
spherical equivalent, astigmatism, endothelial cell counts, and visual acu
ity did not show any significant difference between any group. Conclusion.
Hydrodelamination with BSS is easy to perform and should be undertaken rout
inely to facilitate recipient intralamellar dissection.