Thermodilution versus inert gas rebreathing for estimation of effective pulmonary blood flow

Citation
P. Christensen et al., Thermodilution versus inert gas rebreathing for estimation of effective pulmonary blood flow, CRIT CARE M, 28(1), 2000, pp. 51-56
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00903493 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
51 - 56
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-3493(200001)28:1<51:TVIGRF>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Objective: To compare measurements of the effective pulmonary blood flow (Q (ep), i,e,, nonshunted fraction of cardiac output, Q(t)) by the inert gas r ebreathing (RB) method and the thermodilution (TD) technique in critically ill patients. Design: Prospective, comparative study of a noninvasive method and an estab lished invasive technique. Setting: An 11-bed general intensive care unit in a university hospital. Pa tients: A total of 14 critically ill patients, all mechanically ventilated and monitored with systemic and pulmonary artery catheters, Measurements and Main Results; Q(ep) was determined in duplicate by RE usin g a mass spectrometer for gas analysis. For each determination, Q(t) was me asured in triplicate by the cold water bolus TD technique and averaged. Sim ultaneously mixed venous and arterial blood samples were analyzed to calcul ate the intrapulmonary shunt fraction and thereby convert estimates of Q(t) to Q(ep). Mean difference between paired estimates (RB - TD) was 0.01 L/mi n, So for differences was 1,19 L/min, and 95% confidence interval for the b ias was -0.45 to 0.47 L/min, Coefficients of variation for repeated Q(ep) e stimates were 8% (RB) and 12% (TD), respectively, Coefficients of variation for RE estimates of functional residual capacity and lung tissue volume we re 6% and 17%, respectively. Conclusions: The RE method is a promising method for simultaneous noninvasi ve estimation of Q(ep) and functional residual capacity in mechanically ven tilated patients. However, further investigations are needed to evaluate po tential problems of the method before it can be recommended for clinical pu rposes.