How much guidewire is too much? Direct measurement of the distance from subclavian and internal jugular vein access sites to the superior vena cava-atrial junction during central venous catheter placement

Citation
Rt. Andrews et al., How much guidewire is too much? Direct measurement of the distance from subclavian and internal jugular vein access sites to the superior vena cava-atrial junction during central venous catheter placement, CRIT CARE M, 28(1), 2000, pp. 138-142
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00903493 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
138 - 142
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-3493(200001)28:1<138:HMGITM>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Objective: The introduction of excessive lengths of guidewire during placem ent of central venous catheters from the internal jugular vein (IJV) or the subclavian vein (SCV) can result in rare but significant complications, To identify a "safe" guidewire insertion length, the authors performed direct intravascular measurement of the distance from these venous access sites t o the superior vena cava-atrial junction (CAJ), and evaluated these distanc es relative to the patients' height, weight, sex, and chest radiographs, Design: Prospective, nonrandomized observation, Setting: The Interventional Radiology Department of a tertiary care referra l hospital. Patients: 100 adults (45 women, 55 men) evaluated during fluoroscopically d irected central venous catheter placement, interventions: None, Measurements and Main Results: The distance from the IJV or SCV access site was directly measured using fluoroscopy and an intravascular guidewire, 40 right IJVs, 31 right SCVs, 16 left SCVs, and 13 left IJVs were studied, Co mparative measurements from the postprocedure radiograph were made in 20 of these cases. All measurements were correlated with patient sex, height, an d weight The mean distance from all access sites to the superior vena cava-atrial ju nction was 18.0 cm, The right IJV distance was the shortest, averaging 16 c m, The left SCV distance was the longest, averaging 21.2 cm, Right SCV and left IJV distances were 18.4 and 19.1 cm, respectively, but this difference was not statistically significant. Weight and radiographic measurements di d not correlate with the measured vascular distance, although there was a t rend toward longer distances in taller patients and males. Conclusions: Patient height, weight, and measurements from previous chest r adiographs are less reliable in predicting a safe wire length than is the a ccess site selected, In most cases, 18 cm should be considered the upper li mit of guidewire introduced during central catheter placement in adults. Th e guidewires supplied in catheter kits should have lengths correlated to th ose of the catheters, and should have distance markings printed upon them.