Lj. Kappenberger et al., Clinical progress after randomized on/off pacemaker treatment for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, EUROPACE, 1(2), 1999, pp. 77-84
Background The therapeutic options for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopa
thy (HOCM) classically include medical treatment with beta-blockers and cal
cium antagonists or myectomy-myotomy as a surgical possibility for refracto
ry cases. The observation that pacemaker activation of the heart in HOCM re
duces the subaortic gradient is well known but less well investigated.
Methods Eighty-three patients (33 female and 50 male) mean age 53 (18-82) y
ears, with symptoms refractory to drug treatment and a resting gradient abo
ve 30 mmHg, who responded favourably to temporary pacing, were included in
this prospective study and had a pacemaker (DDD) implanted. After an initia
l double-blind crossover phase of 6 months, patients were reinvestigated at
12 months and followed for a mean of 36 months.
Results As observed during a screening investigation, the obstruction was s
ignificantly reduced from 72 +/- 35 mmHg to 29 +/- 24 mmHg (P<0.01) when th
e pacemaker was on, while no major effect was seen during the sham phase. T
he effect was persistent at 1 year with a remaining resting gradient of 28
+/- 24 mmHg. In parallel, we documented an improvement in functional capaci
ty, according to the NYHA classification and by quality of Life analysis, a
nd a significant improvement in dyspnoea and angina. Exercise on treadmill
improved only in patients with reduced initial tolerance (<8 min). During t
he mean follow-up of 36 months. 65 patients remained on pacing alone, with
eight patients having additional AV-node ablation and five patients finally
having surgery.
Conclusion This controlled multicentre study shows that pacemaker treatment
is an option for HOCM patients; it is inoffensive and does not exclude alt
ernative methods, but satisfies 79% of patients beyond 3 years.