Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of three commercial tablet formulations of mefloquine when given in combination with dihydroartemisinin in patients with acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria
K. Na-bangchang et al., Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of three commercial tablet formulations of mefloquine when given in combination with dihydroartemisinin in patients with acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria, EUR J CL PH, 55(10), 2000, pp. 743-748
Objective: To assess the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability/bioe
quivalence of three commercial tablet formulations of mefloquine, i.e. Lari
am (reference formulation), Mephaquin 100 Lactab and Eloquin-250, when give
n sequentially after dihydro-artemisinin in Thai patients with acute uncomp
licated falciparum malaria.
Methods: Twenty-nine Thai patients with acute uncomplicated falciparum mala
ria were randomised to receive an initial dose of 300 mg dihydroartemisinin
, followed by 1250 mg mefloquine (at 24 h and 30 h after dihydroartemisinin
) given as either Lariam (n=10 cases), Mephaquin (n=9 cases) or Eloquin-250
(n=10 cases). Serial blood samples were obtained up to day 42 after treatm
ent with mefloquine. Mefloquine concentrations were determined in whole blo
od by means of ultraviolet high-performance liquid chromography. The pharma
cokinetic parameters of mefloquine were estimated using non-compartmental a
nd comparmental analysis.
Results: The three combination regimens were well tolerated. However, nine
patients (four and five cases in regimen containing Mephaquin 100 Lactab an
d Eloquin-250, respectively) had reappearance of parasitaemia during the fo
llow-up period. Mefloquine from the three formulations showed significantly
different pharmacokinetic and bioavailability metrics. Significantly lower
peak plasma concentrations (C-max) and areas under the plasma concentratio
n-tome curve (AUC; AUC(0-48h), AUC(0-7days), and total AUC) were observed w
ith Mephaquin 100 Lactab than with the other two formulations. Mean values
for relative bioavailability of the test to standard products were 49.1% (M
ephaquin 100 Lactab) and 72.4% (Eloquine-250). Based on the criteria set, t
he bioavailability of the two tests products (Mephaquin 100 Lactab and Eloq
uine-250) was considered non-equivalent to the reference product with respe
ct to the rate (t(max), C-max) and extent (AUC(0-48)h, AUC(0-7days), total
AUC) of mefloquine absorption.