In this work, a Monte Carlo software package, PET-EGS, designed to simulate
realistic PET clinical studies, was used to assess three different approac
hes to scatter correction in 3D PET: analytical (gaussian fitting technique
), experimental (dual energy window technique) and probabilistic (Monte Car
lo technique).
Phantom and clinical studies were carried out by 3D PET and simulated by PE
T-EGS. A clinical study (F-18- FDG brain study) was simulated assuming PET
emission/transmission multiple-volume images as a voxelised source object d
escribing the distribution of both the radioactivity and attenuation coeffi
cients and accounting for out-of-field activity and media.
The accuracy of PET-EGS in modelling the physical response of a 3D PET scan
ner was assessed by statistical comparison between measured and total (scat
ter + unscatter) simulated distributions (probability for the two distribut
ions to be the same distribution: p > 0.95). The accuracy of the scatter mo
dels, for each scatter correction technique, was evaluated on sinograms by
statistical comparison between the estimated and the simulated scatter dist
ributions (agreement < 1 sigma). The accuracy of scatter correction was eva
luated on sinograms by comparison between scatter corrected and simulated u
nscatter distributions, proving a comparable accuracy of all the considered
scatter correction techniques for brainlike distributed sources.