Design for tolerance of electro-mechanical assemblies: An integrated approach

Citation
Y. Narahari et al., Design for tolerance of electro-mechanical assemblies: An integrated approach, IEEE ROBOT, 15(6), 1999, pp. 1062-1079
Citations number
59
Categorie Soggetti
AI Robotics and Automatic Control
Journal title
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION
ISSN journal
1042296X → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1062 - 1079
Database
ISI
SICI code
1042-296X(199912)15:6<1062:DFTOEA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Tolerancing decisions can profoundly impact the quality and cost of electro -mechanical assemblies. Existing approaches to tolerance analysis and synth esis in design entail detailed knowledge of geometry of the assemblies and are mostly applicable during advanced stages of design, leading to a less t han optimal design process. During the design process of assemblies, both t he assembly structure and associated tolerance information evolve continuou sly, Therefore, significant gains can be achieved by effectively using this information to influence the design of the assembly. Motivated by this, we identify and explore two goals for future research that we believe can enh ance the scope of tolerancing for the entire design process. The first goal is to advance tolerancing decisions to the earliest possible stages of des ign, This issue raises the need for effective representation of tolerancing information during different stages of design and for effective assembly m odeling. The second goal addresses the appropriate, synergistic use of avai lable methods and best practices for tolerance analysis and synthesis, at s uccessive stages of design. Pursuit of these goals leads to the definition of a multilevel approach that enables tolerancing to be addressed at succes sive stages of design in an incremental fashion. The resulting design proce ss, which we call the design for tolerance process, integrates three import ant domains: 1) design activities at successive stages of design; 2) assembly models that evolve continuously through the design process; 3) methods and best practices for tolerance analysis and synthesis. We demonstrate major steps of our proposed approach through a simple, yet i llustrative, example.