Acid-base surface free energies of solids and the definition of scales in the Good-van Oss-Chaudhury theory

Citation
C. Della Volpe et S. Siboni, Acid-base surface free energies of solids and the definition of scales in the Good-van Oss-Chaudhury theory, J ADHES SCI, 14(2), 2000, pp. 235-272
Citations number
60
Categorie Soggetti
Material Science & Engineering
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
ISSN journal
01694243 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
235 - 272
Database
ISI
SICI code
0169-4243(2000)14:2<235:ASFEOS>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
The overwhelming basicity of all analysed surfaces strongly dependent on th e choice of liquid triplet used for contact angle measurements and the nega tive values sometimes obtained for the square roots of the acid-base parame ters can be summarized as the main problems arising from the application of the Good-van Oss-Chaudhury (GvOC) theory to the calculation of Lewis acid- base properties of polymer surfaces from contact angle data. This paper tri es to account for these problems, namely: (1) the Lewis base, or electron d onor component, is much greater than the Lewis acid or electron-acceptor co mponent because of the reference values for water chosen in the original Gv OC theory. A direct comparison of the acidic component with the basic one o f the same materials has no meaning. A new reference scale for water which is able to overcome this problem is suggested. For the calculation of acid- base components, a best-fit approach is proposed which does not require any starting information about the liquids or polymers and can yield estimates of the acid-base parameters for both the liquids and the polymers involved ; (2) the strong dependence of the value of the acid-base components on the three liquids employed is due to ill-conditioning of the related set of eq uations, an intrinsic and purely mathematical feature which cannot be compl etely cured by any realistic improvement in experimental accuracy. To reduc e or eliminate the effect, one only needs a proper set of liquids, represen tative of all kinds of different solvents: (3) the negative coefficients ap pear as a simple consequence of measurement uncertainty, combined with the possible ill-conditioning of the equation set. We cannot exclude, however, that in some cases they could have a different origin.