P. De Paolis et al., Modulation of the AT(2) subtype receptor gene activation and expression bythe AT(1) receptor in endothelial cells, J HYPERTENS, 17(12), 1999, pp. 1873-1877
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Objective To investigate whether angiotensin II type 2 (AT(2)) receptor (AT
(2)-r) promoter activity and expression are modulated by angiotensin II (An
g II), and whether the AT(1) receptor (AT(1)-r) is involved in this effect.
Design and methods Primary endothelial cells obtained from neonatal rat aor
ta, expressing both receptors, were transfected with the rat AT(2)-r promot
er region cloned into a pCAT-reporter vector. The reporter-expression study
was performed in a transient transfection assay system. Transfected cells
were studied following angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition to prevent
endogenous formation of Ang II, Cells were subsequently stimulated for 6 h
with Ang II, either alone or in combination with the AT(1)-r antagonist DuP
753. AT(2)-r mRNA was assessed by RNase protection assay during the same ph
armacological stimuli.
Results Stimulation with Ang II caused an increase in promoter activity (+5
0%, P < 0.05 versus baseline), whereas mRNA expression was reduced by 50% (
P < 0.05 versus baseline). Concomitant treatment with DuP753 and Ang II was
associated with a 98% increase in promoter activity (P < 0.05 versus basel
ine). DuP753 also prevented the reduction in mRNA; it actually produced a 1
00% increase in AT(2)-r mRNA accumulation (P < 0.01 versus baseline), Studi
es with the AT(2)-r antagonist PD123319 indicate that the AT(2)-r is also i
nvolved in the regulation of AT(2)-r gene promoter activity.
Conclusions These data indicate that Ang II increases AT(2)-r promoter acti
vity and decreases AT(2)-r mRNA accumulation in endothelial cells, The AT(1
) subtype receptor is involved in the modulation of both effects of Ang II.
These findings suggest that changes in the expression of AT(2) receptors m
ay occur during treatment with AT(1)-r antagonists, and they indicate the e
xistence of a cross-talk between AT(1) and AT(2) receptors. J Hypertens 199
9, 17:1873-1877 (C) Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.