Sd. Logsdon et al., Field-scale watershed evaluations on deep-loess soils: III. Rainfall and fertilizer N use efficiencies, J SOIL WAT, 54(4), 1999, pp. 711-716
Water is often the most limiting crop production factor but it also can cau
se nutrient runoff and leaching losses. The objectives of this report were
to (1) compare water we efficiency for the production of continuous corn (Z
ea mays L.) on long-term conventional-till and ridge-till watersheds in wes
tern Iowa, and (2) relate water use to fertilizer N use efficiency. Informa
tion on crop yield, rainfall baseflow, runoff; and soil water content was c
ollected over a period of 23 yr. Potential evaporation was calculated from
microclimate data. Using these data, water we efficiency was computed. Nitr
ogen use efficiency was estimated using crop removal and fertilizer applica
tion data. There were no significant differences in seasonal rainfall or es
timated water loss between the two watersheds, but water use efficiency for
ridge-tillage (22.8 kg ha(-1) mm(-1) yr(-1) or 517 lb ac(-1) in(-1) yr(-1)
) was significantly greater than for conventional tillage (20.3 kg ha(-1) m
m(-1) yr(-1) or 460 lb ac(-1) in(-1) yr(-1)). The estimated N removal by cr
op harvest accounted for 48 and 59% of the applied N. Ridge-till reduced ru
noff, increased infiltration, and reduced water loss due to greater residue
; therefore, greater water use efficiency was observed. The ridge-till fiel
d had less residual NO3-N in the root zone for subsequent leaching, but hig
her N concentrations in the baseflow since average N fertilization rates ex
ceeded average crop removal by 68 kg ha(-1) yr(-1). This interaction demons
trates the importance of balancing both N and water we efficiencies to achi
eve a sustainable production system.