J. Suksawat et al., Seroprevalence of Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia equi, and Ehrlichia risticii in sick dogs from North Carolina and Virginia, J VET INT M, 14(1), 2000, pp. 50-55
Ehrlichia canis, E equi, and E risticii seroprevalence was determined by mi
croimmunofluorescent antibody testing (IFA) in a sequential population of 1
,845 sick dogs admitted during a 1-year period to the North Carolina Stars
University Veterinary Teaching Hospital. A seroreactor was defined by a rec
iprocal IFA titer of greater than or equal to 80 to E canis, E equi, or E r
isticii antigens. Of the 48 IFA seroreactors. 44 dogs were seroreactive to
E canis, 21 to E equi, and 0 to E risticii. Seventeen dogs reacted to both
E canis and E equi antigens. There was concordance of E canis IFA and weste
rn immunoblot (WI) test results fur 36/44 dogs. Because of cross-reactivity
of E canis sera with E equi antigens, WI was of less utility to confirm E
equi exposure. After elimination of E canis seroreactors, there was concord
ance of 2/4 E equi IFA and WI test results. Based upon a retrospective revi
ew of medical records, ehrlichiosis was diagnosed in 10/48 (21%) IFA serore
active dogs, 9 of which were confirmed positive by WI. Of the remaining 38
IFA seroreactors, 29 also were confirmed by E canis or E equi WI. These res
ults indicate that (1) ehrlichiosis nor diagnosed in the majority of serolo
gically confirmed cases, (2) based upon E canis and E equi WI analysis, IFA
testing was not specific (21% false positive). (3) E canis sera cross-reac
t with E equi antigens, and (4) serologic evidence of E risticii infection
was lacking in the dog population studied.