Background: NYHA classification is mostly used for graduation of clinical l
imitation due to cardiac failure. Right heart catheterization is not genera
lly used to evaluate hemodynamics and to define the effects of drugs in pat
ients with chronic cardiac failure. Clinical data and results from echocard
iography. stress tests or nuclear cardiology seem to be sufficient. Our aim
was to demonstrate subjectivity of a classification system (NYHA) comparin
g the graduation done by physicians and by patients and to represent the di
fficulty to prognosticate hemodynamic data of patients with heart failure.
Patients and Methods: Limitation of 53 patients with heart diseases was cla
ssified by physicians and patients using NYHA classification. Pulmonary cap
illary wedge pressure (PCWP), stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output were pr
edicted by physicians; they were allowed to utilize all examination data th
ey could get. Predicted hemodynamic data were compared with the results of
measurement at rest and during exercise.
Results: Patients classified themselves significantly worse than physicians
did: 2.68 +/- 0.64 vs. 2.23 +/- 0.74 (p = 0.0012), Similarity in NYHA clas
sification was found in 29/53 eases. Correlation of predicted and measured
hemodynamic data was low: PCWP (at rest) r = 0.346; PCWP (during exercise)
r = 0.232; SV (at rest) r = 0.476; SV (during exercise) r = 0.445; HMV (at
rest) r = 0.412; HMV (during exercise) r = 0.538.
Conclusion: Clinical classification systems like NYHA are subjective, class
ification by physicians differs significantly from classification by patien
ts. Prediction of hemodynamics is not possible despite all examination data
had been available. Right heart catheterization is necessary to define hem
odynamics at rest and during exercise.