Background. Intravenous urography (IVU) is considered an integral imaging c
omponent of the nephrourological work-up in a wide array of clinical settin
gs. At our institution there is an open-access policy with regard to reques
ting IVU studies.
Methods. In a prospective, blinded observational study we undertook to asse
ss the diagnostic yield of IVU with respect to the source of referral (i.e.
Urology, Nephrology, GP, A & E, other speciality) and the presenting featu
res, such as renal colic, haematuria, bladder outflow obstruction, recurren
t urinary tract infection (UTI) etc. Two hundred consecutive patients were
evaluated.
Results. Overall, 23% of tests were positive. There was a highly significan
t difference in diagnostic yield between the groups (P<0.001 for both refer
ral source and test indication). A positive result was most likely after re
ferral by a kidney specialist (37.1%) and when the test indication was rena
l colic (42%) or haematuria (32%). The yield was <15% in all other circumst
ances, with 94.9% and 92.1% of GP- and other hospital speciality-initiated
IVUs being negative. When investigating recurrent UTI, 91.7% of tests were
negative and 86.2% were negative when the indication was bladder outflow ob
struction.
Conclusions. It is suggested that an open access policy for IVU is not just
ified, especially when cost and the risk associated with contrast media and
radiation exposure are taken into account. Our study supports the abandonm
ent of routine IVU in the investigation of UTI and bladder outflow obstruct
ion.