COMPARISON OF CONJUNCTIVAL AUTOGRAFTS, AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE GRAFTS, AND PRIMARY CLOSURE FOR PTERYGIUM EXCISION

Citation
P. Prabhasawat et al., COMPARISON OF CONJUNCTIVAL AUTOGRAFTS, AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE GRAFTS, AND PRIMARY CLOSURE FOR PTERYGIUM EXCISION, Ophthalmology, 104(6), 1997, pp. 974-985
Citations number
57
Categorie Soggetti
Ophthalmology
Journal title
ISSN journal
01616420
Volume
104
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
974 - 985
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-6420(1997)104:6<974:COCAAM>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of the study is to determine whether amniotic membrane can be used as an alternative to conjunctival autograft after pterygium excision. Design: A prospective study of amniotic membrane grafts (group A) and primary closure (group B) was compared retrospect ively with conjunctival autografts (group C) in patients with pterygia . Participants: Group A included 46 eyes with primary pterygia and 8 e yes with recurrent pterygia, group B had 20 eyes with primary pterygia , and group C consisted of 78 eyes with primary and 44 eyes with recur rent pterygia. Intervention: For the above three different surgeries, the amount of tissue removed was estimated from histopathologic analys is, and the result was evaluated by clinical examination. Main Outcome Measures: Recurrence, survival analysis, and final appearance were co mpared. Results: In group A, the recurrence rate was 10.9%, 37.5%, and 14.8% for primary, recurrent, and all pterygia, respectively (mean fo llow-up, II months), These three rates were significantly higher than 2.6%, 9.1%, and 4.9% noted in group C (mean follow-up, 23 months) (P < 0.001, 0.018, and 0.01, respectively). However, the latter recurrence rate was significantly lower than 45% (mean follow-up, 5.2 months) in group B for primary pterygia (P < 0.001), The onset of recurrence was delayed significantly in group C as compared with that of groups A an d B. Conclusions: The relatively low recurrence rate for primary ptery gia allows one to use amniotic membrane transplantation as an alternat ive first choice, especially for advanced cases with bilateral heads o r those who might need glaucoma surgery later.