I. Taskintuna et al., LOW-DOSE INTRAVITREAL CIDOFOVIR (HPMPC) THERAPY OF CYTOMEGALOVIRUS RETINITIS IN PATIENTS WITH ACQUIRED-IMMUNE-DEFICIENCY-SYNDROME, Ophthalmology, 104(6), 1997, pp. 1049-1057
Purpose: The authors have shown that long-term treatment of cytomegalo
virus (CMV) retinitis with 20-mu g intravitreal injections of cidofovi
r (HPMPC) is highly effective but may be associated with iritis and pr
ofound hypotony. They evaluated the efficacy and safety of 10-mu g int
ravitreal injections of cidofovir and made comparisons with their find
ings of 20-mu g injections. Methods: The current study was conducted a
s a nonrandomized consecutive case series at the AIDS Ocular Research
Unit of the University of California at San Diego. Twenty-seven eyes o
f 18 patients were injected with 10 mu g intravitreal cidofovir and ha
d complete follow-up. These were compared with another consecutive ser
ies of 24 eyes of 17 patients injected with 20 Ixg of cidofovir. Main
Outcome Measures: The main outcome in this study was the incidence of
failure to respond to treatment with 10-mu g injections. The authors a
lso compared the time to progression of CMV retinitis after the initia
l intravitreal injections of 10 mu g and 20 mu g of cidofovir. Seconda
ry outcomes included incidence of iritis and changes in intraocular pr
essure (IOP) after cidofovir injections. Results: The median time to r
etinitis progression was 45 days after a single intravitreal injection
of 10 mu g cidofovir compared with 55 days with the authors' series o
f 20-mu g injections. This difference was statistically significant (P
= 0.033, log-rank test) and appeared to be due principally to a 26% i
ncidence of primary failure in the 10-mu g group (progression greater
than or equal to 750 mu m within 28 days, P = 0.0017 Wilcoxon test). P
rogression after a second injection of 10 mu g cidofovir was more rapi
d (32 days, P = 0.037). The incidence of iritis after 10-mu g injectio
ns was 2.2% compared with 23% with 20-mu g injections (P = 0.003, Fish
er's exact test, two-tailed). There was less decrease in IOP between t
he baseline injection and subsequent visits in the 10-mu g group. Conc
lusions: Treatment of CMV retinitis with 10-mu g intravitreal cidofovi
r injection was not as effective as with 20 mu g and may allow develop
ment of drug resistance, but there were fewer side effects with the 10
-mu g dose. The drug appears to have a narrow therapeutic index, and o
ther attempts at reducing the side effects while preserving the long-a
cting effect, such as liposome delivery, may be warranted.