Kr. Arouri et al., Biological affinities of Neoproterozoic acritarchs from Australia: microscopic and chemical characterisation, ORG GEOCHEM, 31(1), 2000, pp. 75-89
A range of well-preserved Neoproterozoic acanthomorph and sphaeromorph acri
tarchs from the Australian Centralian Superbasin have been individually ana
lysed by combined microscopic and chemical methods. The acanthomorph acrita
rchs generally exhibit two or more cell wall categories and have fine lamin
ations with no obvious trilaminar sheath structure, whereas the sphaeromorp
h acritarchs are characterised by a single cell wall structure with no dist
inct laminations. The significant organic carbon content of the acritarchs
is evident by the EDS analysis. Petrological indices (Thermal Alteration In
dex less than or equal to 2.8, and strong yellow fluorescence) suggest a lo
w thermal maturity for both coexisting acritarch groups. The biomarker comp
osition of the enclosing-rock is similarly indicative of low thermal maturi
ty, although most of the rock extract has probably originated from other so
urces including the lipid fraction of the acritarchs' cell membrane and cyt
oplasm rather than the preserved cell walls. In contrast, however, very lim
ited chemical data was obtained directly from the morphologically-preserved
component of the acritarchs by micro-FTIR and pyrolysis GC-MS analyses, an
d these results are consistent with a polyaromatic biomacromolecule of high
recalcitrance. A large signal attributable to significant carbon-ordering-
a characteristic of polyaromatic structures-was detected by laser micro-Ram
an spectroscopy. A unique ultrastructural and molecular entity of the studi
ed Neoproterozoic acritarchs is indicated although a distinct fibrillar mul
tilayered wall and a condensed polyaromatic macromolecular structure sugges
t a possible link between acanthomorph taxa and dinoflagellates. The contra
sting maturity values indicated by the respective petrographic and chemical
data highlight the need for a more rigorous correlation of these different
maturity parameters. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.