Short-, mid-, and long-term reproducibility of the atrial signal-averaged electrocardiogram in healthy subjects: Comparison with the conventional ventricular signal-averaged electrocardiogram
I. Savelieva et al., Short-, mid-, and long-term reproducibility of the atrial signal-averaged electrocardiogram in healthy subjects: Comparison with the conventional ventricular signal-averaged electrocardiogram, PACE, 23(1), 2000, pp. 122-127
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Although atrial signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) has been proposed
for noninvasive identification of patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias, t
he substantial variability of the measurement limits the clinical value. Th
e aim of the study was to assess the short- to long-term reproducibility of
atrial SAECG and to compare it to that of the conventional ventricular SAE
CG in 51 healthy volunteers (30 men; age 32 +/- 8 years). In each subject,
SAECG recordings were obtained using MAC-VU electrocardiograph and HiRES an
d PHiRES software (Marquette Medical Systems) and repeated after 5 minutes,
1 day, 1 week, and 1 month. Automatically detected onset and offset of the
filtered QRS complex and P wave were subsequently corrected by two indepen
dent observers, and the averaged values were used for the analysis. Convent
ional ventricular SAECG parameters: filtered QRS duration (QRS(tot)), low a
mplitude signal duration, and root mean square voltage (RMS) of the termina
l 40 ms of QRS; and 5 atrial parameters: filtered P wave duration (P-tot),
RMS of the terminal 40, 30, 20 ms, and of the entire P wave were obtained.
Relative errors of different pairs of measures were used to assess the intr
asubject reproducibility. QRS(tot) and P-tot were the most reproducible par
ameters. The relative errors after 5 minutes, 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month we
re 0.8% to 2.4% for QRS(tot), and 1.3% to 4.2% for P-tot. For RMS voltages,
the relative errors exceeded 15% in short-term and 20% in long-term record
ings. Although P-tot as statistically less reproducible than QRS(tot), the
reproducibility of the former was good and comparable to that of the QRS(to
t). The reproducibility of the voltage parameters was significantly poorer
than that of the duration parameters. The study showed a satisfactory short
- and long-term reproducibility of P-tot in the atrial SAECG in healthy sub
jects. However, low reproducibility of the Voltage parameters should be con
sidered in clinical applications.