INVESTIGATIONS ON THE CORRELATION PATTERN IN EVEN-AGED STANDS OF LARCH .4. RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN NEIGHBORHOOD CORRELATIONS AND MEANS OF DIFFERENT ENTRIES
M. Huhn et W. Langner, INVESTIGATIONS ON THE CORRELATION PATTERN IN EVEN-AGED STANDS OF LARCH .4. RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN NEIGHBORHOOD CORRELATIONS AND MEANS OF DIFFERENT ENTRIES, Silvae Genetica, 45(5-6), 1996, pp. 329-336
For a dynamic description of spatial neighbourhood correlation pattern
s of stands of larch and an analysis of temporal changes and time tren
ds of such patterns during stand development extensive: data sets from
a field trial (trial no. 1) with 27 entries of Larix decidua MILL. (L
arix europaea DC.), Larix kaempferi (LAMB.) CARR. (Larix leptolepis (S
IEB. et Zucc.) SIEB. ex GORD.), and Larix x eurolepis HENRY have been
used. Single tree measurements of this trial were available for 7 stag
es of stand development (ages: 11, 13, 18, 19, 42, 49 and 50 years). A
dditionally, for a static description of spatial neighbourhood correla
tion patterns of stands of larch extensive data sets from 9 field tria
ls (trials nos. 2 to 10) with a varying number (8 to 23) of entries ha
ve been used which provide an analysis of the correlations between nei
ghbours at only one point in time. These trials are slightly different
in their ages (7 to II years). Single tree measurements for all 10 tr
ials were available for the traits height and diameter at breast heigh
t (for the 2 ages 42 and 49 of trial no. 1 only diameter measurements
were available). Additionally, the diameter values are transformed and
analysed as individual basal areas. The correlative structure for mea
surements of neighbouring individuals for these trials with regular sq
uare spacings (5 m x 5 m for trial no. 1 and 1.5 m x 1.5 m for trials
nos. 2 to 10) has been described by 12 different correlation coefficie
nts. These coefficients are defined by considering quite different spa
tial configurations of competitive neighbourhoods. In these procedures
and analyses the diagonally located neighbours of a subject tree and
its missing neighbours too are explicitly considered. The question of
this paper is: Are there any relationships between means and spatial n
eighbourhood correlations for the different entries? Relationships val
id for all traits, for all trials and for all ages = stages of stand d
evelopment have not been observed for this plant material. Some intere
sting special results were obtained - for example: 1. For the dynamic
description during stand development of trial no. 1, relationships amo
ng the yields of competing neighbours are independent on the yield lev
el. With regard to the amount of the rank correlations (positive or ne
gative) between means and spatial neighbourhood correlations for most
cases one obtains: {height} greater than or equal to (diameter) congru
ent to (individual basal area). 2. For the static description of the t
rials nos. 2 to 10 (each with only 1 measurement) the results strongly
depend on the individual trial.