"On-line" versus memory-based judgments: Triggering conditions and empirical methods for differentiation

Citation
G. Hertel et H. Bless, "On-line" versus memory-based judgments: Triggering conditions and empirical methods for differentiation, PSYCHOL RUN, 51(1), 2000, pp. 19-28
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
PSYCHOLOGISCHE RUNDSCHAU
ISSN journal
00333042 → ACNP
Volume
51
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
19 - 28
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-3042(2000)51:1<19:"VMJTC>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
In social perception two different judgment processes can be distinguished. On the one hand judgments can be formed "on-line" during the encoding of i nformation and stored as independent units in memory. On the other hand per sons can form judgments later after the encoding of the information. In thi s case they first have to recall earlier encoded information as a basis of their judgments. In the current paper we review conditions eliciting these judgmental processes. We then discuss several methods to differentiate empi rically between on-line and memory-based judgments. Two experiments were co nducted to compare these different discrimination methods. The results show that quality of memory as well as response latencies (for judgments and fo r memory) are reliable in discriminating between on-line and memory-based j udgments. Response latencies also enabled more detailled analyses of judgme nt processses. In contrast, correlational methods provided less reliable di scrimination between on-line and memory-based judgments.