Uj. Schoepf et al., Segmental and subsegmental pulmonary arteries: Evaluation with electron-beam versus spiral CT, RADIOLOGY, 214(2), 2000, pp. 433-439
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
PURPOSE: To compare contrast agent-enhanced spiral and electron-beam comput
ed tomography (CT) for the analysis of segmental and subsegmental pulmonary
arteries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT angiography of the pulmonary arteries was perform
ed in 56 patients to rule out pulmonary embolism. Electron-beam CT was perf
ormed in 28 patients. The other 28 patients underwent spiral CT with compar
able scanning protocols. The depiction of segmental and subsegmental arteri
es was analyzed by three independent readers. The contrast enhancement in t
he main pulmonary artery was measured in each patient.
RESULTS: Analysis was performed in 1,120 segmental and 2,240 subsegmental a
rteries. One segmental (RA7, P = .010) and two subsegmental (LA7b, P = .029
; RA6a+b, P = .038) arteries in paracardiac and basal segments of the lung
were depicted significantly better with electron-beam CT. There was no stat
istically significant difference between electron-beam and spiral CT in the
total number of analyzable peripheral arteries depicted. The mean contrast
enhancement in the main pulmonary artery was 362 HU in electron-beam CT st
udies versus 248 HU in spiral CT Studies.
CONCLUSION: Detailed visualization of peripheral pulmonary arteries is well
within the scope of advanced CT techniques. Electron-beam CT has minor adv
antages in analyzing paracardiac arteries, probably because of reduction of
motion artifacts and higher contrast enhancement. Further studies are need
ed to establish whether electron-beam CT allows a more confident diagnosis
of emboli in these vessels.