It is known that the problem of binary (or M-ary) hypothesis testing can be
addressed in terms of the estimation of one (or M - 1) discrete parameters
which can assume the values (C) and i. In the same fashion, the problem of
composite hypothesis testing and parameter estimation can be seen as the j
oint estimation of a set of mixed discrete and continuous parameters, which
can be modelled as random variables. In this paper, a comparison between s
erial and joint detection and parameter estimation schemes is carried out.
The mathematical formulation is set up for the case of maximum a posteriori
detectors and estimators; analytical results are derived for a meaningful
case study, which permit to deeply understand the different mechanisms whic
h govern the two schemes. The obtained results show that, although in quite
different fashions, both schemes achieve the optimum average performance f
or a given amount of a priori information. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. A
ll rights reserved.