Background and Purpose-Previous work indicated that patients within 1 month
of parietal or posterior frontal damage are often abnormally slow or clums
y when using the ipsilateral hand for dexterity tasks. This article reports
a 6-month follow-up study to assess recovery and the impact on functional
outcome.
Methods-Twenty-four patients (80%) were available for follow-up. They used
the ipsilateral hand on a dexterity test that simulated everyday hand funct
ion. Weakness and ideomotor apraxia were also assessed. Performance was com
pared with that of healthy age-matched control subjects using the same hand
. Rating scales for self-care and dexterity in everyday life were completed
by patients and carers.
Results-Significant recovery had occurred on all measures, but patients wit
h left hemisphere damage remained impaired on the dexterity test, with 7 pa
tients (58%) scoring below the normal range. Five of these were apraxic. Re
ports of everyday functioning did not reflect this impairment, but there we
re inconsistencies in these reports, which raised doubts as to their accura
cy.
Conclusions-Ipsilateral dexterity shows recovery during the first 6 months,
but there may be persistent impairment related to apraxia after left hemis
phere stroke. It appears that the impact of this on functional outcome is t
ypically small compared with the large effect of severity of contralateral
paresis. It may be a significant factor in some cases, however, and direct
observation of everyday functioning would be needed to clarify more subtle
effects on outcome.