L. Haimberger et M. Hantel, Implementing convection into Lorenz's global cycle. Part II. A new estimate of the conversion rate into kinetic energy, TELLUS A, 52(1), 2000, pp. 75-92
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
TELLUS SERIES A-DYNAMIC METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY
The global conversion rates into available potential and kinetic energy (Lo
renz's quantities G and C) have been traditionally evaluated on the gridsca
le (G(grid), C-grid approximate to +2.5 +/- 0.4 W/m(2)). Convective phenome
na acting on the sub-gridscale (like, e.g., thunderstorms) have been treate
d as molecular. In Part I of this study it has been outlined how Lorenz's e
nergy cycle may be extended to include sub-gridscale processes. For this pu
rpose new fluxes, particularly the global mean conversion rate into kinetic
energy on the sub-gridscale (C-sub), have been defined. Evaluating them is
the purpose of the present Part II. C-sub is closely related to the buoyan
cy production term of turbulence kinetic energy which can be expressed thro
ugh the vertical sub-gridscale fluxes of moisture and heat. A thermodynamic
diagnostic model (DIAMOD) that estimates these fluxes indirectly from grid
scale analyses is applied. In this way the conversion rate has been calcula
ted for three months using global reanalysis data from ECMWF and from NCEP/
NCAR. The errors of our results are caused by the analysis data used, by th
e specification of the ratio between moisture and heat fluxes (the main clo
sure assumption in DIAMOD) and by uncertainties in the radiative heating fi
eld; they are given here at the 95% level. We find C-sub = + 2.2 +/- 1.7 W/
m(2). The new complete conversion rate C = C-grid + C-sub is + 4.7 +/- 2.0
W/m(2). This figure is the main result of this study, presented here for th
e first time: Lorenz's energy cycle, if extended to the sub-gridscale, is a
bout twice as intense as in the traditional approximations. In contrast to
C-sub the sub-gridscale generation rate G(sub) and therefore the complete G
cannot be evaluated. All one can do is to improve the estimate of G(grid)
by improving the estimates of the net heating. For G(grid) We find the new
value of + 3.1 +/- 0.5 W/m(2).