This article seeks evidence of predatory practices by major US air carriers
. Specifically, attempts are made to determine the following: (1) whether m
ajor carrier incumbents respond more aggressively to entry by smaller carri
ers than they do to entry by other major carriers; (2) whether major carrie
rs respond more aggressively to smaller carriers than do smaller carriers t
hemselves; and, (3) whether smaller entrants fail at a greater rate than ma
jor carriers. Little evidence of any practices by major incumbent carriers
against smaller new entrants that can be deemed predatory, rather than norm
al competitive behavior, is found.