J. Lankoski et M. Ollikainen, The environmental effectiveness of alternative agri-environmental policy reforms: theoretical and empirical analysis, AGR FOOD SC, 8(4-5), 1999, pp. 321-NIL_2
This paper analyzes alternative agri-environmental policy reforms to reduce
nutrient runoff when the government has price support, fertilizer tax, buf
fer zone subsidy and acreage subsidy as available instruments. To promote e
nvironmental goals, the government is assumed to adjust the tax and subsidy
rates so as to keep the farmer's profits constant. This instrument switch
reduces the prices of less-polluting inputs and the farmer re-optimizes his
production so that it becomes more environmentally friendly. The four alte
rnative reforms under study are the following: a reduction of the producer
price support or acreage subsidy compensated for by a higher buffer zone su
bsidy, and an increase in the fertilizer tax which is compensated for by ei
ther a higher acreage subsidy or a buffer zone subsidy. We show theoretical
ly that although all reforms reduce the nutrient runoff, the last one is th
e most efficient. Our simulations show that at a 30 % abatement level of ni
trogen runoffs all policy mixes decrease the average farmer's profits after
the re-adjustment, if the end price is not allowed to increase due to decr
eased production. The smallest loss in the farmer's profits results from a
policy mix which compensates for the higher fertilizer tax by a higher acre
age subsidy.