Mk. Schaufele et al., Dosing practices of physicians for anticoagulation with warfarin during inpatient rehabilitation, AM J PHYS M, 79(1), 2000, pp. 69-74
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION
Objective: To determine the percentage of international normalized ratios (
INRs) maintained within the therapeutic range for patients receiving chroni
c anticoagulation treatment with warfarin during inpatient rehabilitation.
Design: A consecutive, 4-month, retrospective chart review of all patients
receiving oral anticoagulation treatment was conducted in a large academic
rehabilitation center. The percentage of INRs within and out of the, therap
eutic range, frequency of blood samples, length of therapy, and warfarin do
se prescribed by physicians were calculated. A total of 181 patients receiv
ing chronic anticoagulation treatment were identified. A total of 3709 bloo
d samples were analyzed. In 74 patients, the primary physician recommended
a therapeutic range (Group 1). In the remaining 107 patients, no therapeuti
c range was specified, and a target INR range of 2.0-3.0 was assumed (Group
2).
Results: In Group 1, the INRs were in the recommended range in 38.2% of all
blood samples. In Group 2, 37.6% of all blood drawn was within an INR rang
e of 2.0-3.0. Statistical analysis showed that no better accuracy was obtai
ned when the INR range was predefined by a physician (Group 1) or assumed t
o be in the 2.0-3.0 range (Group 2; P = 0.839).
Conclusions: Despite frequent physician monitoring, this study demonstrates
the difficulty in maintaining INRs within therapeutic ranges for patients
receiving oral anticoagulation. An overall tendency for underdosing is obse
rved. Improvement is necessary, given the high morbidity and mortality asso
ciated with insufficient anticoagulation in rehabilitation inpatients.