Second primary malignancies following the treatment of early stage ovariancancer: Update of a study by the National Cancer Institute of Canada-Clinical Trials Group (NCIC-CTG)
Sf. Dent et al., Second primary malignancies following the treatment of early stage ovariancancer: Update of a study by the National Cancer Institute of Canada-Clinical Trials Group (NCIC-CTG), ANN ONCOL, 11(1), 2000, pp. 65-68
Background: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecological
malignancies and the fourth most frequent fatal malignancy in women. Despi
te improved surgical techniques as many as 20% of women with early stage di
sease will eventually relapse and die from their disease. The post-operativ
e management of these women remains controversial. Here we present the long
term follow-up data of our previously published study, as well as the inci
dence of second primary malignancies in these women.
Patients and methods: Two hundred fifty-seven eligible patients with stage
I, IIA `high risk' ovarian carcinoma and IIB, IIIO (disease confined to pel
vis) were randomized to either whole abdominal radiotherapy 2,250 rads in t
en fractions (107 patients), melphalan 8 mg/m(2)/d x 4 weeks x 18 courses (
106 patients) or intraperitoneal chromic phosphate 10-20 mCi (44 patients).
All patients were initially treated with pelvic radiotherapy.
Results: Overall survival estimates at 10 years were: 45% in the whole abdo
minal radiotherapy arm; 49% in the melphalan arm and 50% in the intraperito
neal chromic phosphate arm (P = 0.30). Relapse-free survival estimates at 1
0 years were: 50% in the whole abdominal radiotherapy arm, 62% in the melph
alan arm and 51% in the chromic phosphate arm (P = 0.147). Long term follow
-up has not demonstrated a significant difference between treatment arms. S
econd primary malignancies developed in 29 women (11%) after 2,229 person y
ears of follow-up. This compares to 18.7 second primary malignancies which
would have been expected in this group of age-matched controls and was stat
istically significant (P = 0.018). There was no significant difference in t
he total number of second primary malignancies between treatment arms. Melp
halan appeared to be associated with an increased risk of developing leukem
ia/myelodysplastic syndrome compared to the whole abdominal radiotherapy ar
m (P = 0.06).
Conclusions: Long-term follow-up has not demonstrated a significant differe
nce in overall or disease free survival between treatment arms. An excess o
f second primary malignancies (35%) was observed suggesting that lifelong s
urveillance is required in this population. Further research with newer tre
atment programs are needed to improve the cure rates in this population.