Climate policy is often discussed as a lever with which to bring about clim
ate-friendly technical innovation and diffusion. However, quantitative poli
cy assessments routinely treat technological change as a factor that is ind
ependent of policy. Stabilizing atmospheric concentrations of CO2 cannot be
achieved through marginal changes in the way we supply and use energy. The
only path to stabilization of climate over the next century that is consis
tent with widely accepted population and economic-growth scenarios involves
substantial decoupling of energy services from carbon emissions. The requi
red rate of structural and technical change for such a goal has been experi
enced only in the wake of economic and resource crises and for periods of a
decade or less. Historic rates of structural and technical change averaged
over a century are far from adequate for stabilizing climate. In this pape
r, we review technical changes in the energy system and a few instances in
which energy economic models have begun to include technical change as an e
ndogenous feature of their assessments. Finally, we consider the implicatio
ns of considering endogenous technical change for critical climate policy q
uestions, such as the cost of control and the appropriate timing of the emi
ssions mitigation effort.