A. Bacher et al., EFFECTS OF PENTOXIFYLLINE ON HEMODYNAMICS AND OXYGENATION IN SEPTIC AND NONSEPTIC PATIENTS, Critical care medicine, 25(5), 1997, pp. 795-800
Objective: To evaluate the effects of pentoxifylline on hemodynamics a
nd systemic oxygenation in septic and nonseptic critically ill patient
s. Design: Prospective clinical investigation. Setting: Intensive care
unit (ICU) of a university hospital. Patients: Nineteen critically il
l patients were included in the study 1 to 4 days after their admissio
n to the ICU. A systemic inflammatory response syndrome was present in
12 patients, fulfilling at least two of the American College of Chest
Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference cri
teria. The other seven patients did not fulfill these criteria and wer
e classified as nonseptic. Interventions: All patients were mechanical
ly ventilated. The dosage of catecholamines was kept constant during t
he entire study period and at least during 15 mins before the start of
the study. In both study groups, pulmonary and radial artery catheter
s were inserted and 5 mg/kg of pentoxifylline (diluted in 300 mL of ph
ysiologic saline) was intravenously administered over a period of 180
mins at a rate of 100 mL/hr. Measurements and Main Results: Hemodynami
c variables, oxygen transport (Do(2)), oxygen uptake (Vo(2)), and oxyg
en extraction ratio were determined before pentoxifylline, after 2.5 m
g/kg of pentoxifylline, after 5 mg/kg of pentoxifylline, and 60 mins a
fter the termination of pentoxifylline. Repeated-measures analysis of
variance and Mann-Whitney test were used for statistical analysis. At
baseline, there were significant differences between the septic and th
e nonseptic groups in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (septic: 31 +/-
5 mm Hg; nonseptic: 26 +/- 7 mm Hg, p < .05), and pulmonary vascular
resistance index (PVRI) (septic: 344 +/- 121 dyne.sec/cm(5).m(2); nons
eptic: 233 +/- 100 dyne.sec/cm(5).m(2), p < .05). In the septic group,
significant increases in heart rate and cardiac index were observed.
Systemic vascular resistance index and PVRI decreased. No significant
changes in hemodynamic variables occurred in the nonseptic group. In b
oth groups, Do(2) and Vo(2) increased significantly, while oxygen extr
action ratio remained unchanged. Conclusions: The administration of pe
ntoxifylline to septic patients results in a significant improvement i
n hemodynamic performance compared with critically ill nonseptic patie
nts. The better hemodynamic state is accompanied by an increase in Do(
2) acid Vo(2) with unchanged oxygen extraction ratio.