This paper examines the key issues involved in evaluating cost and benefits
of various accredited criteria of an environmental assessment scheme in Ho
ng Kong. Economic benefit-cost ratios have been developed for various crite
ria to help the developers and designers to identify the economic impact an
d cost effectiveness of the accredited criteria. Results of this analysis r
eveal that the economic benefit-cost ratios vary among different credits, a
nd 24 out of total 56 credits could provide potential economic benefit for
the developers and designers. Accordingly, a decision strategy for prioriti
sing the criteria selection has been developed for the developers and desig
ners. Besides, the use of economic benefit-cost ratios for revising the wei
ghting scale within the performance-specific criteria is discussed. (C) 200
0 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.