Background-Recent findings suggesting the involvement of adventitial cells
in coronary repair have raised questions regarding the phenotypic "plastici
ty" of medial, smooth muscle cells (SMCs). Accordingly, the aims of the pre
sent study were to examine the characteristics of coronary medial and adven
titial cells and to compare the responses of coronary and noncoronary SMCs
to stimulation.
Methods and Results-Enzymatically isolated coronary SMCs (human and porcine
) were distinct from noncoronary SMCs, showing poor adhesion and spreading,
as well as lower proliferation, collagen synthesis, and LDL degradation. S
everal extracellular matrix components (Matrigel, collagen I and IV, lamini
n, vitronectin, fibronectin) or growth factors (epidermal growth factor, pl
atelet-derived growth factor-BE, insulin growth factor-1, interleukin-1 alp
ha) failed to augment the adhesion or proliferation of coronary SMCs to the
levels observed in noncoronary SMCs. Unlike coronary SMCs, coronary fibrob
lasts demonstrated high adhesion, proliferation, collagen synthesis, and av
id LDL metabolism. Limited responses of coronary SMCs were associated with
sustained expression of differentiation markers (alpha-smooth muscle actin,
h-caldesmon, and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain), whereas noncoronary SM
Cs showed marked phenotypic heterogeneity.
Conclusions-Coronary SMCs appeared to maintain highly differentiated phenot
ype in response to stimulation, whereas coronary adventitial fibroblasts de
monstrated several characteristics that are essential during vascular repai
r. Coronary SMCs, however, were distinct from noncoronary medial cells, whi
ch displayed greater phenotypic heterogeneity and versatility in culture. W
e postulate that the mechanism of vascular repair may differ among vascular
beds, pointing to the importance of coronary artery-specific investigation
s in vascular biology.