Facial growth in a cleft palate patient treated with the Herbst appliance:A long-term profile roentgenographic and roentgen stereometric analysis ofprofile changes and displacement of the jaws
Kv. Sarnas et al., Facial growth in a cleft palate patient treated with the Herbst appliance:A long-term profile roentgenographic and roentgen stereometric analysis ofprofile changes and displacement of the jaws, CLEF PAL-CR, 37(1), 2000, pp. 71-77
Objective: To monitor facial development in a patient with cleft palate who
was treated with the Herbst appliance. Monitoring was in terms of changes
in the skeletal profile and growth in the circummaxillary sutures and tempo
romandibular joints (TMJs).
Design: Prospective profile roentgenography (between the ages of 6 and 20 y
ears) and roentgen stereometric analysis (between the ages of 8 and 19 year
s).
Setting: Center for Craniofacial Anomalies and Department of Plastic and Re
constructive Surgery, Malmo University Hospital, Malmo, Sweden.
Patient: Boy with cleft of the soft and posterior part of the hard palate a
nd marked facial convexity.
interventions: Surgical repair of the soft palate at age 9 months, velophar
yngeal flap at age 8 years, and insertion of implants under general anesthe
sia and treatment with the Herbst appliance at age 11 years. Roentgen exami
nations were performed in connection with continued clinical evaluations an
d treatment.
Main outcome measures: Profile roentgenograms were traced and measured by o
ne of the authors using conventional point-based analysis. Stereo roentgeno
grams were digitized by the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Malmo, Univer
sity Hospital.
Results: The direction of profile changes was partly discordant with the di
rection of articular growth in the circummaxillary sutures and TMJs. The su
ccessful treatment result was accomplished by a temporary influence on sagi
ttal growth direction in the circummaxillary sutures and on rotational grow
th direction in the TMJs, combined with a favorable natural remodeling and
articular growth pattern.
Conclusions: The mode of growth by which treatment aims were reached was pa
rtly unexpected, i.e., discordant with the generally accepted principal con
cept that treatment with the Herbst appliance positions the mandible forwar
d.