Alternation of factors limiting phytoplankton production in the Cape Fear River Estuary

Citation
Ma. Mallin et al., Alternation of factors limiting phytoplankton production in the Cape Fear River Estuary, ESTUARIES, 22(4), 1999, pp. 825-836
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
Aquatic Sciences
Journal title
ESTUARIES
ISSN journal
01608347 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
825 - 836
Database
ISI
SICI code
0160-8347(199912)22:4<825:AOFLPP>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Phytoplankton nutrient limitation experiments were performed from 1994 to 1 996 at three stations in the Cape Fear River Estuary, a riverine system ori ginating in the North Carolina piedmont. Nutrient addition bioassays were c onducted by spiking triplicate cubitainers with various nutrient combinatio ns and determining algal response by analyzing chlorophyll a production and C-14 uptake daily for 3 d. Ambient chlorophyll a, nutrient concentration, and associated physical data were collected throughout the estuary as well. At a turbid, nutrient rich oligohaline station, significant responses to n utrient additions were rare, with light the likely principal factor limitin g phytoplankton production. During summer at a mesohaline station, phytopla nkton community displayed significant nitrogen (N) limitation, while both p hosphorus (P) and N were occasionally limiting in spring with some N + P co -limitation. Light was apparently limiting during fall and winter when the water was turbid and nutrient-rich, as well as during other months of heavy rainfall and runoff. A polyhaline station in the lower estuary had clearer water and displayed significant responses to nutrient additions during all enrichment experiments. At this site N limitation occurred in summer and f all, and P limitation (with strong N + P co-limitation) occurred in winter and spring. The data suggest there are two patterns controlling phytoplankt on productivity in the Cape Fear system: 1) a longitudinal pattern of decre asing light limitation and increasing nutrient sensitivity along the salini ty gradient, and 2) a seasonal alternation of N limitation, light limitatio n, and P limitation in the middle-to-lower estuary. Statistical analyses in dicated upper watershed precipitation events led to increased flow, turbidi ty, light attenuation, and nutrient loading, and decreased chlorophyll a an d nutrient limitation potential in the estuary. Periods of low rainfall and river flow led to reduced estuarine turbidity, higher chlorophyll a, lower ambient nutrients, and more pronounced nutrient limitation.