Effect of vasovasostomy on contralateral testicular damage associated withunilateral vasectomy in mature and immature Lewis rats

Citation
Da. West et al., Effect of vasovasostomy on contralateral testicular damage associated withunilateral vasectomy in mature and immature Lewis rats, FERT STERIL, 73(2), 2000, pp. 238-241
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
FERTILITY AND STERILITY
ISSN journal
00150282 → ACNP
Volume
73
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
238 - 241
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-0282(200002)73:2<238:EOVOCT>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Objective: We sought to determine if laser-assisted vasovasostomy could rev erse the contsalateral histologic testicular changes associated with unilat eral vasectomy. Design: A prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled study. Setting: Animal microsurgical laboratory, St. John's Mercy Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri. Patient(s): Twenty mature and 20 immature male Lewis r ats. Intervention(s): Ten mature and 10 immature male Lewis rats underwent unila teral vasectomy. At 5 months, testicular biopsy and laser-assisted vasovaso stomies were performed followed 2 months later by evaluation of vas patency and repeat testicular biopsy. Control animals consisted of 10 rats in each group, 5 that undervent sham operations and 5 that had halothane anesthesi a alone. Result(s): In the immature and mature groups unilateral vasectomy resulted in marked contralateral testicular damage in 30% (3 of 10) and 50% (5 of 10 ), respectively. Vas patency determined 2 months after vasovasostomy was 80 % (8 of 10) in the mature group and 89% (8 of 9) in the immature group. No animal that had contralateral testicular changes after vasectomy and a pate nt vas after vasovasostomy showed improvement in testicular histology. Conclusion(s): It appears that contralateral testicular damage associated w ith unilateral vasectomy is not improved 2 months after successful vasovaso stomy in mature or immature Lewis rats. (Fertil Steril(R) 2000;73: 238-41. (C) 2000 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)