While face-to-face bargaining has proven itself to be extremely efficient i
n the laboratory, it appears to break down often in the real world. This di
screpancy, we assert, is explained by the fact that in the real world face-
to-face bargaining is usually conducted not between principals but between
the agents of principals. We find a substantial increase in inefficiency wh
en bargaining is conducted through agents rather than through principals an
d offer an explanation for this rise in inefficiency. As such, this paper h
elps to shed light on the growing literature on delegation, commitment, and
preference distortion games. Journal of Economic Literature Classification
Numbers: C78, C92. (C) 2000 Academic Press.