Estimates of the number of chromosomal breakpoints that have arisen (e.g.,
by translocation and inversion) in the evolutionary past between two specie
s and their common ancestor can be made by comparing map positions of marke
r loci. Statistical methods for doing so are based on a random-breakage mod
el of chromosomal rearrangement. The model treats all modes of chromosome r
earrangement alike, and it assumes that chromosome boundaries and breakpoin
ts are distributed randomly along a single genomic interval. Here we use si
mulation and numerical analysis to test the validity of these model assumpt
ions. Mean estimates of numbers of breakpoints are close to those expected
under the random breakage model when marker density is high relative to the
amount of chromosomal rearrangement and when rearrangements occur by trans
location alone. But when marker density is low relative to the number of ch
romosomes, and when rearrangements occur by both translocation and inversio
n, the number of breakpoints is underestimated. The underestimate arises be
cause rearranged segments may contain markers, vet the rearranged segments
may, nevertheless, be undetected. Variances of the estimate of numbers of b
reakpoints decrease rapidly as markers are added to the comparative maps, b
ut are less influenced by the number or type of chromosomal rearrangement s
eparating the species. Variances obtained with simulated genomes comprised
of chromosomes of equal length are substantially lower than those obtained
when chromosome size is unconstrained. Statistical power for detecting hete
rogeneity in the rate of chromosomal rearrangement is also investigated. Re
sults are interpreted with respect to the amount of marker information requ
ired to make accurate inferences about chromosomal evolution.