Snowfall and surface meteorological data from five takeoff accidents relate
d to inadequate deicing or antiicing are examined. Despite common values of
liquid-equivalent snow fall rate, temperature, and windspeed, the visibili
ty varied widely. The common values of liquid-equivalent snowfall rates are
consistent with recent studies showing that the mater content of the snow
is the primary factor responsible for the failure of deicing fluids to prot
ect an aircraft from reicing, Liquid-equivalent rates, however, are not ava
ilable to pilots in real time, and so they instead rely on their own vision
or a National Weather Service snowfall intensity estimate based on visibil
ity to estimate snowfall rate. It is shown that snow intensity estimates ba
sed on visibility alone can often mislead pilots into thinking that conditi
ons are not as bad as they actually are. We define the hazard as high-visib
ilily-high-snowfall-rate conditions. Nighttime conditions lead to a factor
of two increase in visibility during snowfall as compared to daytime, also
contributing to the high-snowfall-rate-high-visibility condition. Wind is s
hown to result in an enhanced accumulation of snow on a wing when an aircra
ft is facing downwind and stationary due to the approximate 10 deg angle of
the wing to the horizontal. Nearly all of the accidents also occurred duri
ng the peak snowfall period of a storm in association with snowbands.