While the choice of stationary phase, organic modifier, and gradient s
trength can have significant effects on biomolecule separations, mobil
e phase additives can also have a significant effect on the chromatogr
aphic selectivity, recovery, efficiency and resolution. Given the impo
rtance of stationary phase coverage, the beneficial, silanol-masking p
roperties of amines, and the potential for selectivity modification th
rough ion-pair interactions, cyclohexylamine was examined as a mobile
phase additive and compared with triethylamine and trifluoroacetic aci
d. Greatly improved separation was possible when cyclohexylamine was u
sed as compared with phosphate buffer, and cyclohexylamine did not req
uire purification before use, while triethylamine required distillatio
n before 'clean' chromatograms were obtained. (C) 1977 by John Wiley &
Sons, Ltd.