Relationships between condensation nuclei number concentration, tides, andstandard meteorological variables at Mace Head, Ireland

Citation
Ew. O'Brien et al., Relationships between condensation nuclei number concentration, tides, andstandard meteorological variables at Mace Head, Ireland, J GEO RES-A, 105(D2), 2000, pp. 1973-1986
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Volume
105
Issue
D2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1973 - 1986
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
The set of hourly averaged condensation nuclei (CN) data collected at Mace Head during 1991-1994 was examined for relationships that might exist betwe en CN number concentrations and the more commonly measured meteorological v ariables, including tides. CN number concentrations at Mace Head can be cha racterized by typically low "background" levels (less than about 700 partic les cm(-3)) when the wind is from the west, somewhat higher "background" le vels (1000-4000 particles cm(-3)) when the wind is from the east, with spor adic bursts of short-lived discrete "events" of more than 10,000 cm (-3) fo r several hours. These events occur typically during early afternoon and ar e normally associated with slack winds and anomalously warm, dry air. They appear to be independent of pressure, wind direction and precipitation. The y can occur any time during the year, although the strongest events tend to occur during spring and autumn. Large-amplitude low tides also occur predo minantly in the early afternoon during this observing period. We present ev idence that large CN concentration events occur preferentially after except ionally low tides during daylight. A neural network was employed to train t he standard meteorological variables to predict CN concentrations. Baseline forecasts of CN counts for the final 180 days of the observing period were made using lagged values of all other variables. Further forecasts were ma de with some variables removed from the predictor set. The best correlation between the predicted values and the verifying data over the 180 days was 0.67, which was obtained from a 1-hour forecast using knowledge of all vari ables except temperature. Other variables whose removal improved the foreca st (or whose presence degraded it) were pressure and wind speed. The best p redictors of CN values were wind direction, relative humidity, and time of day. An elementary "nearest neighbor," or "historical analogue" approach to predicting the same set of CN values generated lower correlations with the verifying data but generated a much more accurate probability distribution function.