Orienting domains in proteins using dipolar couplings measured by liquid-state NMR: Differences in solution and crystal forms of maltodextrin bindingprotein loaded with beta-cyclodextrin
Nr. Skrynnikov et al., Orienting domains in proteins using dipolar couplings measured by liquid-state NMR: Differences in solution and crystal forms of maltodextrin bindingprotein loaded with beta-cyclodextrin, J MOL BIOL, 295(5), 2000, pp. 1265-1273
Protein function is often regulated by conformational changes that occur in
response to ligand binding or covalent modification such as phosphorylatio
n. In many multidomain proteins these conformational changes involve reorie
ntation of domains within the protein. Although X-ray crystallography can b
e used to determine the relative orientation of domains, the crystal-state
conformation can reflect the effect of crystal packing forces and therefore
may differ from the physiologically relevant form existing in solution. He
re we demonstrate that the solution-state conformation of a multidomain pro
tein can be obtained from its X-ray structure using an extensive set of dip
olar couplings measured by triple-resonance multidimensional NMR spectrosco
py in weakly aligning solvent. The solution-state conformation of the 370-r
esidue maltodextrin-binding protein (MBP) loaded with beta-cyclodextrin has
been determined on the basis of one-bond N-15-H-N, N-15-C-13' Cr-13(alpha)
-13C', two-bond C-13'-H-N, and three-bond C-13(alpha)-H-N dipolar couplings
measured for 280, 262, 276, 262, and 276 residues, respectively. This conf
ormation was generated by applying hinge rotations to various X-ray structu
res of MBP seeking to minimize the difference between the experimentally me
asured and calculated dipolar couplings. Consistent structures have been de
rived in this manner starting from four different crystal forms of MBP. The
analysis has revealed substantial differences between the resulting soluti
on-state conformation and its crystal-state counterpart (Protein Data Bank
accession code 1DMB) with the solution structure characterized by an 11(+/-
1)degrees domain closure. We have demonstrated that the precision achieved
in these analyses is most likely limited by small uncertainties in the intr
adomain structure of the protein (ca 5 degrees uncertainty in orientation o
f internuclear vectors within domains). Ln addition, potential effects of i
nterdomain motion have been considered using a number of different models a
nd it was found that the structures derived on the basis of dipolar couplin
gs accurately represent the effective average conformation of the protein.
(C) 2000 Academic Press.