Background. Investigations of cuspal-coverage amalgam restorations suggest
that tooth fracture is the leading cause of failure, while for Class I and
II restorations, the leading cause is caries. In this study, the authors ev
aluated the causes of failure for a large number of cuspal-coverage restora
tions.
Methods. The causes of failure for 706 cuspal-coverage amalgam restorations
were determined through the use of a questionnaire. Dentists from a variet
y of dental schools; Army, Navy, Ar Force, Public Health and Veterans Affai
rs dental clinics; and private practice were asked to record pertinent info
rmation regarding patients and restoration failures from choices provided o
n a survey form.
Results. The survey documented 706 failed restorations. Mandibular first mo
lars accounted for 36.25 percent of all failures. The majority of failures
were caused by fractured teeth (24.3 percent), caries (20 percent) and frac
tured restorations (17.1 percent). Among all of the failed restorations, 82
.15 percent were restorable, 9.35 percent were repairable and 8.50 percent
were nonrestorable. Among the fractured teeth, 80 percent were restorable,
14.5 percent were nonrestorable and 5.5 percent were repairable. Among the
carious teeth, 84 percent were restorable, 8 percent were nonrestorable and
8 percent were repairable. A chi(2) analysis revealed that tooth fracture
was more likely to be associated with nonrestorability than either caries (
chi(2) = 5.013, P <.05) or restoration fracture (chi(2) = 6.202, P <.05).
Conclusions. The leading cause of failure among the 706 restorations was to
oth fracture, which resulted in significantly greater numbers of nonrestora
ble teeth than either caries or fractured restorations.
Clinical Implications. Tooth fracture creates a greater risk of nonrestorab
ility than any other cause of failure. Replacement or coverage of fracture-
prone cusps is likely to improve the life expectancy of complex amalgam res
torations.