Objective: To determine if large angle esotropia and exotropia could impact
a person's ability to obtain employment.
Design: Laboratory experiment.
Participants: Seventy-nine respondents unaware of the purpose of the study.
Methods: Photographs of two men and two women were digitally altered to cre
ate photographs of the same individual in an orthotropic, esotropic, and ex
otropic state. The photographs were then randomly affixed to similarly qual
ified job resumes. The 79 study respondents, unaware of the purpose of the
study, were asked to (1) rate each individual applicant on selected job qua
lification variables, and (2) rank the applicants against each other in ord
er of hiring preference.
Main Outcome Measures: Individual applicant rating and hiring preference sc
ores.
Results: Women with normal ocular alignment received greater hiving prefere
nce scores than did strabismic women (P = 0.007). No difference in hiring p
reference scores was noted between strabismic and non-strabismic male appli
cants (P = 0.47).
Conclusions: Large angle horizontal strabismus appeared to be vocationally
significant for female applicants, reducing a strabismic female applicant's
ability to obtain employment. The presence of strabismus did not appear to
influence hiring decisions of male applicants. (C) 2000 by the American Ac
ademy of Ophthalmology.