Reliability is an important issue in power systems and historically has bee
n assessed using deterministic criteria and indexes. However, these approac
hes can be, and in many cases have been, replaced by probabilistic methods
that ui-e able to respond to the actual stochastic factors that influence t
he reliability of the system. In the days of global, completely integrated
and/or nationalized electricity supply industries, the only significant obj
ective was the reliability seen by actual end users (consumers). Also, the
system was structured in a relatively simple way such that generation, tran
smission, and distribution could be assessed as a series of sequential hier
archical levels. Failures at any level could cause interruptions of supply
to the end user (the only specific customer at that rime). All planning and
operational criteria (both deterministic and probabilistic) were intended
to minimize such interruptions within economic limits. The system has been,
or is being, restructured quite remarkably in recent times and now many in
dividual parties are involved, often competitively, including generators (b
oth remote large-scale generators, and small-scale distributed or embedded
generators), network owners, network operators, energy suppliers, regulator
s, as well as the end users (consumers). Each of these par ties has a need
to know the quality and performance of the system sector or subsector for w
hich they (and their shareholders) are responsible. Therefore, there is now
a need for a range reliability measures; the actual measure(s) needed vary
ing between the different system parties. This paper addresses these issues
and, in particular, reviews existing approaches and how these may be used
and/or adapted to suit the needs and the required indexes of the new compet
itive industry and the different parties associated with it.