Study Design. The effect of cement augmentation of wedge-fractured vertebra
l bodies on spine segment compliance was studied in 16 cadaver specimens.
Objectives. 1) To assess the mechanical effects of cement augmentation of v
ertebral wedge fractures. 2) To determine whether a new reduction/injection
procedure has the same mechanical effects as the established direct inject
ion procedure.
Summary of Background Data. Although wedge fractures cause pain and disabil
ity in hundreds of thousands of people, few effective treatments are availa
ble. Clinical studies have shown that cement augmentation, a new procedure,
effectively relives pain and restores mobility in patients suffering from
weak or fractured vertebrae. However, only a few studies have examined the
mechanics of vertebral augmentation.
Methods. A wedge fracture was created in the middle vertebra of 16 three-ve
rtebra cadaver spine segments. Neutral and full-load compliance of each fra
ctured spine segment in flexion/extension and lateral bending were assessed
by measuring the relative rotation of the vertebral bodies in response to
applied moments. Eight of the fractured vertebral bodies were then augmente
d using direct injection, while the remaining eight fractured vertebral bod
ies were augmented using a combined reduction/injection procedure. Complian
ce of the augmented segments was then assessed.
Results. Augmentation significantly reduced the neutral compliance (reducti
on of 25% +/- 23%) (mean +/- standard deviation) and the full-load complian
ce (reduction of 23% +/- 20%) in flexion/extension (P < 0.005). Augmentatio
n also significantly reduced the neutral compliance (reduction of 34% +/- 2
0%) and the full-load compliance (reduction of 26% +/- 17%) in lateral bend
ing (P < 0.0001). No significant difference was found between the two proce
dures for compliance reduction.
Conclusions. Augmentation of wedge fractures using both direct injection an
d reduction/injection reduces spine segment compliance significantly.