The natural variations of the Earth's magnetic field of periods spanning fr
om milliseconds to decades can be used to infer the conductivity-depth prof
ile of the Earth's interior. Satellites provide a good spatial coverage of
magnetic measurements, and forthcoming missions will probably allow for obs
ervations lasting several years, which helps to reduce the statistical erro
r of the estimated response functions.
Two methods are used to study the electrical conductivity of the Earth's ma
ntle in the period range from hours to months. In the first, known as the p
otential method, a spherical harmonic analysis of the geomagnetic field is
performed, and the Q-response, which is the transfer function between the i
nternal (induced) and the external (inducing) expansion coefficients is det
ermined for a specific frequency. In the second approach, known as the geom
agnetic depth sounding method, the C-response, which is the transfer functi
on between the magnetic vertical component and the horizontal derivative of
the horizontal components, is determined. If one of these transfer functio
ns is known for several frequencies, models of the electrical conductivity
in the Earth's interior can be constructed.
This paper reviews and discusses the possibilities for induction studies us
ing high-precision magnetic measurements from low-altitude satellites. The
different methods and various transfer functions are presented, with specia
l emphasis on the differences in analysing data from ground stations and fr
om satellites. The results of several induction studies with scalar satelli
te data (from the POGO satellites) and with vector data (from the Magsat mi
ssion) demonstrate the ability to probe the Earth's conductivity from space
. However, compared to the results obtained with ground data the satellite
results are much noisier, which presumably is due to the shorter time serie
s of the satellite studies.
The results of a new analysis of data from the Magsat satellite indicate hi
gher resistivity in oceanic areas than in continental areas. However, since
this holds for the whole range of periods between 2 and 20 days, this diff
erence probably is not caused purely by differences in mantle conductivity
(for which one would expect less difference for the longer periods). Furthe
r studies with data from recently launched and future satellites are needed
.