Two pig abattoirs (A and B) equipped with an automated head-only and head-t
o-chest electrical stunning system, and two (C and D) equipped with a manua
l carbon dioxide stunning system, were evaluated to compare the effectivene
ss of stunning in a total of 10,454 pigs slaughtered under commercial condi
tions. In the abattoirs with the electrical stunning system, the percentage
of animals that responded to a nose prick was significantly lower (P<0.05)
in abattoir B, where a higher current intensity was used (P<0.05). than in
abattoir A. No righting reflex was observed in the electrically stunned pi
gs. In the abattoirs with the carbon dioxide stunning system, the percentag
e of animals that responded to a nose prick and showed a righting reflex wa
s significantly lower (P<0.05) in abattoir C,where the duration of the carb
on dioxide cycle was longer and the interval between discharge from the sys
tem to sticking was shorter (P<0.05). than in D. Comparing the electrical a
nd carbon dioxide stunning systems, the pigs stunned with carbon dioxide we
re significantly more responsive to a nose prick (P<0.05) and 25 per cent o
f them showed a righting reflex. Under the conditions of the study the full
y automated head-only stunning with additional chest electrodes appeared to
be more effective and less susceptible to incorrect handling than the manu
al carbon dioxide stunning system.