Officials in Fort Collins, Colorado, have encountered public disagreement o
ver prairie dog (Cynomys spp.) management in the city but have lacked objec
tive information about conflict with prairie dogs, as well as the knowledge
levels and attitudes of the public. Using a survey of Fort Collins residen
ts (n=87) living near prairie dog colonies and a random sample (n=559) of t
he city's general population, we assessed conflict with prairie dogs, compa
red attitudes toward prairie dogs and management preferences between reside
nts near colonies and the general population, and tested for association be
tween knowledge levels and attitudes toward prairie dogs and management pre
ferences. Seventy percent of the respondents living adjacent to prairie dog
s reported having problems with them; respondents with natural grassland or
pasture land on their property were most likely to report problems. Compar
ed to the general population, respondents living near colonies were more li
kely to express negative attitudes toward prairie dogs (P<0.01), more likel
y to prefer poisoning prairie dogs over capturing and relocating (P<0.01),
and more knowledgeable about prairie dogs (P<0.001). A management approach
combining preservation and control was advocated by 84% of respondents livi
ng near prairie dogs and 68% of the general population. Among the general p
opulation, respondents with greater knowledge about prairie dogs were more
likely to agree (P<0.05) that the rodents keep hawks and eagles nearby and
that destroying prairie dogs lowers the risk of disease for pets and the ri
sk of injury to horses. Respondents with greater knowledge also were more l
ike ly to agree with using poisons to remove prairie dogs from an area (P<0
.001) and less likely to agree with using capture and relocation (P<0.001).
However, knowledge was not associated (P>0.05) with attitudes toward prair
ie dogs or with acceptance of a management approach combining preservation
and control.